Investors Who Have Not Obtained EB-5 Conditional Lawful Permanent Resident Status


Posted on 03/17/2013 by Mark A. Ivener, A Law Corporation

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

It is well-established that in visa petition proceedings, a petitioner must establish eligibility at the time of filing and that a petition cannot be approved if, after filing, the petitioner becomes eligible under a new set of facts or circumstances. See, e.g., Matter of Izummi, 22 I. & N. Dec. at 175 (“If counsel had wished to test the validity of the newest plan, which is materially different from the original plan, he should have withdrawn the instant petition and advised the petitioner to file a new Form I-526.”) (citing Matter of Katigbak, 14 I. & N. Dec. 45, 49 (Reg. Comm’r 1971)). In addition, the petitioner must continue to be eligible for classification at the time of adjudication of the petition.

Thus, consistent with Matter of Izummi, if there are material changes to a Form I-526 at any time after filing, the petition cannot be approved. Under these circumstances, if, at the time of adjudication, the petitioner is asserting eligibility under a materially different set of facts than when the petition was filed, he or she must file a new Form I-526 petition. For example, if a petitioner files a Form I-526 petition purporting to be associated with a particular industry group within the scope of an approved regional center but, subsequent to filing, it is determined that the proceeds of the investment will be directed to a job-creating entity in another industry group, the petition may not be approved.

A deficient Form I-526 petition may not be cured by subsequent changes to the business plan or factual changes made to address any other deficiency. The only way to perfect material changes under these circumstances is for the immigrant investor to file a new Form I-526 petition to correspond to the changed plans.

Similarly, if, after the approval of a Form I-526 petition but before an alien investor has been admitted to the United States or adjusted his or her status pursuant to that petition, there are material changes to the business plan by which the alien intends to comply with the EB-5 requirements, the alien investor would need to file a new I-526 petition. Such material changes would constitute good cause to revoke the approved petition and would result in the denial of admission or an application for adjustment of status.

Taken directly from USCIS’ EB-5 Adjudications Policy Memorandum posted on February 14, 2013.

Share this Article

About the Author

Mark Ivener is an experienced business and EB-5 immigration attorney who has written 5 books on Immigration Law as well as has written numerous articles and spoken at many events on EB-5 topics.

Categories